More articles in this category
Top Stories

National Union of Namibian Workers (NUNW) president Ismael Kasuto is clinging to the federation’s leadership after a majority of affiliate s...

President Hage Geingob has described the late liberation war heroine Angelika Muharukua as a selfless cadre whose qualities are now rare to find. ...

Swapo 2017: What Have They Done This is the third part in a series where The Villager will analyse what each of 11 Swapo Party top four candida...

Controversially “deposed” president of the National Union of Namibian Workers (NUNW) Ismael Kasuto has exclusively told The Villager t...

Some members of the Ondonga community want the police officers who harassed them during a peaceful meeting at Okakodhi in Oshikoto prosecuted. ...

Swapo 2017: What Have They Done This is the second part in a series where The Villager will analyse what each of 11 Swapo Party top four candid...

Other Articles from The Villager

Where to for NamibiaÔÇÖs labour movement?

Mon, 7 April 2014 02:37
by Herbert Jauch
Columns

Last month, a new booklet on Namibia’s trade unions was published under the title “Trade Unions At The Crossroads”.
It looks at challenges and opportunities for Namibian trade unions today, including their role at the workplace and beyond. Namibia has almost 40 registered trade unions, which are divided into two federations and possibly a third one in the making.
The differences between unions are most pronounced when it comes to the question of their broader role in society.
Unions have long debated the question of how they can decisively influence policies in favour of their working class constituency. What should they do if the party they were fighting alongside during the liberation struggle no longer pursues an agenda that benefits workers? Which kind of alliances should unions form to push for a more radical and transformative socio-economic agenda? These questions must be confronted by any progressive labour movement, not only in southern Africa but everywhere. A key factor that currently undermines the potential strength of Namibia’s labour movement are the ongoing internal divisions.
During the Unam lecture series last year, the audience repeatedly asked the union leaders: “We should be fighting poverty, yet it seems before doing so, we start fighting each other. How can we fight collectively instead of fighting each other?”
The audience also questioned how labour bodies influence national documents like Vision 2030 and the National Development Plans (NDPs). Despite forming the economic backbone, workers seem to have little or no influence on the content of development plans and similar guiding documents.
During the Unam discussions, it was also noted Namibian unions are resorting less to mass mobilisation regarding employment and other social and political issues. Instead, they are merely negotiating for better wages at the workplace.  
“Are unions still interested in broader national issues, such as the economy?” was one of the questions asked.
Another critical aspect is the question of whom Namibian trade unions represent today arose. Given the fragmentation of the labour market (into formal and informal, casual and permanent, rural and urban, employed and unemployed, etc.) unions seem to be unable to recruit beyond the confines of permanent workers in the formal economy.
Although they are aware of this challenge, very few unions have practically tackled the task of recruiting marginalised workers on a significant scale. This raises the question; do unions represent the working class or just a section, thereof?
Also, Namibian unions have not yet addressed the country’s enormous levels of inequality in any visible and/or meaningful way. As pointed out during the Unam lecture series, today, about 10% of the population controls 65% of the cash income while 90% of the population have to share the remaining third. Thus, Namibia has not managed to change the structures of apartheid as income structures were largely maintained. Even the unions’ approach to salary negotiations often reinforces this trend, because across-the-board increases benefit those in higher income categories at the expense of those at the lower end. A 10% increase for a person earning N$1500 a month, for example, means an increase of N$150 while a person earning N$20 000 a month will benefit from an additional N$2000. Thus, across-the-board increases widen the income gap.
Unions today have to deal with poverty, inequality and the clash of interests in a capitalist society. Such clashes of interests even occur within unions where leaders earn far more than their members and thus do not face the same challenges as workers who struggle to make ends meet.  Today, the issue of class divisions permeates the whole of Namibian society and it includes the trade unions. One of the fundamental questions thus is; is the working class still adequately represented by trade unions?
It would be interesting to see which route Namibian trade unions take in the years to come. They need to take stock of what they fought for since independence, what they have achieved and what the current constraints are in terms of moving forward. They also need to debate what kind of society they envisage and how they can meaningfully contribute towards building it.  Fragmenting the labour movement into more and more splinter unions that fight each other rather than building substantive working class unity and strong bargaining units at workplaces across the country will certainly not benefit Namibian workers in the long run.
Namibia’s labour movement is currently a “work in progress” and the slogan of the Mozambican revolutionaries, “A luta continua” (the struggle continues), still seems very relevant today.