More articles in this category
Top Stories

The municipality of the city of Windhoek’s number of approved plans increased in January on a monthly basis, Simonis Storm Securities has an...

The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) is seeking the assistance of the public in tracing a Zimbabwean national, Repent Maboda who is involved in a ...

The research associate at the Institute of Public Policy Research, Maximillian Weylandt, says that the government must transfer responsibilities o...

  Despite moves by the president to cut costs through travel restrictions, doing away with double deputy ministers and a raft of cost-cutting ...

The Namibian Police issued 9 245 summons which in total were worth N$ 9 688 050, between 28 November last year and 18 January this year,...

A group of Grootfontein residents are out for blood after they were allegedly duped into investing in over 30 homes by Tulaing Properties Limited,...

Other Articles from The Villager

DBN warns creditors against debt rescheduling

Wed, 3 June 2015 23:05
by online writer
News Flash

Development Bank of Namibia Communication Manager Jerome Mutumba, has warned bank creditors against rescheduling of debt payments adding that it delays enterprise growth and capital formation of owners.

In a press statement, Mutumba explained that the primary purpose of rescheduling has been to ensure that enterprises continue delivering development impact, even though payments may be delayed.

He further said that the secondary purpose has been to ensure that collateral, particularly in the form of fixed property is preserved in order for the Bank to actively seek to prevent bankruptcy and its impacts on families, employees and communities. He however also added that there is a small number of entrepreneurs who abuse the concession of debt rescheduling even though they have the ability to repay loans.

“Delays in scheduled repayments, in spite of the ability to make repayments, indicate that the borrower is redirecting financial resources in spite of commitment to the terms of the loan, which can be caused either by personal expenditure or expenditure on other enterprises” Mutumba said.

He further added that both types of expenditure, at the expense of repayment to the Bank, extend the period of repayment. “Rescheduling also increases the accumulated interest due to the bank which places the enterprise at a disadvantage in the long term by reducing long-term profitability, and growth potential of the enterprise” Mutumba said.

In addition, Mutumba said that in the case of personal expenditure, the Bank counsels individuals not to make drawings against profits, but to provide for salary in the cash-flow projection, and preserve as much capital in the enterprise with the goal of long-term personal wealth through long-term enterprise growth.

“If the borrower seeks rescheduling to avoid repayment, that borrower risks the Bank's caution, and possible delays, or even a refusal, in the event of a requirement for rescheduling based on serious circumstances in the enterprise environment” he said.

Furthermore, Mutumba said an additional potential burden to the unwilling payer is that the Bank may assign a higher risk rating to the borrower in future if a second loan is requested, place more restrictive conditions if an additional loan is requested or assign a higher interest rate.

He further said that the Bank has put in place several mechanisms to reduce the phenomenon, which include ongoing monitoring of repayment, better management of collateral held by the Bank and enhanced collection which in turn increases the cost of lending by the Bank.

“Reluctance to repay loans in the manner stated in agreements is a twin expense to the Bank and the borrower. The Bank counsels that borrowers who are reluctant to repay consider the cost to themselves in particular, and not avoid repayment for personal spending or short-term enterprise opportunities” Mutumba said.